BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Accross World Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18829 (24 September 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18829.html
Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18829

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Accross World Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18829 (24 September 2004)

     
    18829
    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2004/0140
    Copy sent to
    Appellant Respondents
    ACROSS WORLD LIMITED
    Appellant
    - and -
    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE
    Respondents
    Tribunal: DR NUALA BRICE (Chairman)
    MRS S EDMONDSON FCA
    Sitting in public in London on 22 September 2004
    DIRECTION
    Under Rule 30(8)
    THIS was an appeal against a default surcharge for the accounting period ending on 31 October 2003; the return and tax were due on Sunday 30 November 2003 but the return and the cheque for part of the tax were not received until 3 December 2003
    WE HEARD Mr C M Williams for the Appellant and Mr P Webb for the Respondents
    WE FIND THAT: the amount of tax due for the accounting period ending on 30 November 2003 was £168,729.75; that the return was signed and posted by the Appellant on Friday 28 November 2003 with three cheques, one for £100,000 dated 28 November 2003, one for £38,000 post-dated 19 December 2003 and one for £30,729.75 post-dated 28 December 2003; that the return and the cheques were received on 3 December 2003; and that prior to posting the cheques the Appellant had telephoned Customs and Excise to agree to payment by installments even though it had the funds to pay all the tax on the due date
    OUR DECISION IS that we were not satisfied that the return and the cheque for £100,000 were dispatched at such a time and in such a manner that it was reasonable to expect that they would be received by the Respondents before Sunday 30 November 2003 and that, although the Appellant had telephoned Customs and Excise to agree to payment by installments, Customs and Excise had not said that there would be no surcharge and so there was no reasonable excuse for the late payment
    AT THE CONCLUSION of the appeal we announced our decision to dismiss the appeal and both parties agreed that they did not want a full written decision
    WE THEREFORE DIRECT that the appeal be dismissed
    DR A N BRICE
    Chairman
    Release Date: 24 September 2004
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2004


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18829.html